Nottingham Building Society Conveyancing Panel Information

The information on this page is designed to keep solicitors and licensed conveyancers abreast of latest requirements changes by Nottingham Building Society and to assist in remaining on the Nottingham Building Society Approved Conveyancing Solicitors Panel.

Nottingham Building Society Conveyancing Panel Assistance:

What are the Nottingham Building Society conveyancing panel criteria?
Unlike the CML the Building Society Mortgage Instructions deal with this. Section A.12 states ‘In order to act on our behalf your firm or company must be a member of our conveyancing panel provided we are a society that operates one – see specific requirements for details of our arrangements. The Special Requirements state:

Minimum of 2 principle partners, minimum 3 year trading history, £2m liability insurance or £3m for LLP’s, practising certificates required and Sole practitioners not acceptable. Contact Lending services

You must also comply with the terms and conditions of your Nottingham Building Society solicitor panel appointment.

Being a lawyer on the Nottingham Building Society solicitor panel who should we contact if I have a query about the BSA conveyancing instructions ?
If you are a solicitor and have a concern regarding the instructions, you should make contact with Nottingham Building Society. The BSA will not advise or comment on specific queries relating to Nottingham Building Society or other lenders.
A recent SRA survey reveals that three quarters of solicitors have been removed or threatened with removal from a lender conveyancing panel. Nottingham Building Society and other building societies have restricted their panel over the years. Why?
The feeling from lenders generally (we can not speak for Nottingham Building Society specifically), is that for too long solicitors have concentrated on their duty of care to their purchasing client, and have paid scant attention to the duty they owe to the lender, whom they conveniently forget is also their client.

Looking from the lenders’ perspective, it has to be said that there are pressures to encourage smaller panels. The Financial Services Authority regards the open panel system as a major contributor to mortgage fraud and negligence cases, and has been leaning on lenders to move to proactive panel management, which is more expensive the larger the panel. Hence it is becoming more common for lenders to charge fees, and/or require extensive form-filling, from would-be panel members

Nottingham Building Society and other BSA lenders are in varying stages of reviewing their approach to vetting firms on their conveyancing panels, to ensure their ongoing exposure to unsuitable firms is reduced.

I understand that Nottingham Building Society could request or audit my files as I am on the Nottingham Building Society conveyancing panel. Are there any confidentiality issues that I need to consider first?
We can't comment specifically on Nottingham Building Society. Many major lenders are now introducing ‘file auditing’ as standard practice in relation to completed matters. This raises questions of confidentiality in relation to the buyer client and the purpose to which the results of such audits will be put. The starting point is to remember that the file does not belong to your firm, it belongs to the ‘client’. But, of course, we will normally have two clients – the buyer and the lender - and you will owe a duty of confidentiality to each. So basically, you have to separate the file and just send the lender the parts solely relating to themselves. But, of course, as this will basically be correspondence with the lender, mortgage instructions etc.

Check with your Compliance Officer, but a firm should not send the complete conveyancing file without the borrower client’s express consent – and if he is in arrears with the lender he is hardly likely to agree. However, if the lender can establish a prima facie case of fraud, then you may be under an obligation to disclose the whole file.

The emerging convention is that lenders are including an authority to disclose in loan application forms to counter this problem. Mortgage Express v Sawali, 2010 EWHC 3054 (Ch) indicates that such provisions valid? Please click here for more information about that case.

I noticed the following question on my PI renewal form this year ‘Has your Firm been asked by a lender to agree to more onerous terms and conditions than provided for in the BSA Mortgage Instructions?’ My firm is on a number of bank panels including the Nottingham Building Society conveyancing panel. We have Terms and Conditions of appointment which we are duty bound to comply with. Am I supposed to mention these Terms?
The concern here is if you are expect to enter into ‘more onerous’ conditions that than the Handbook obligations.

You have to try and take an objective view as to whether the Terms relating to the Nottingham Building Society conveyancing appointment (or other terms for other lenders) are ‘more onerous’ than the BSA Mortgage Instructions. Depending on the Terms you may need to provide details on your renewal form. If you are in any doubt please call your broker to discuss before moving forward on this question.

Are figures published regarding the Nottingham Building Society conveyancing panel size and the number of conveyancing firms removed from their panel each year?
With mortgage companies and conveyancers working so closely together it is surprising that there has not been greater demand for the introduction of a bit of transparency regarding not just the figures for the Nottingham Building Society conveyancing panel but for all bank panel listings
What lender panels do you receive the most questions about?
BSA lenders do not come within the top 20 lenders in terms of frequency of questions. The most popular lender panels in terms of questions are as follows:
I am a sole practitioner firm on the Nottingham Building Society conveyancing panel. How can we advertise our firm as carrying out conveyancing in Hendon who can act for the borrower and Nottingham Building Society?
5 people search for a property lawyer on the Nottingham Building Society panel each month in Hendon. Please contact the team at lenderpanel.com to see how your firm can be found by those searching for conveyancing in Hendon.

Find a Lawyer on the Nottingham Building Society Approved Conveyancing Solicitors Panel

powered by LenderPanel

Average number of days to register title including a charge in favour of Nottingham Building Society
This information relates to purchase only and not remortgages.
YearDays*
2025 [no data]
2024 [no data]
2023 [no data]
2022 [no data]
2021 [no data]
2020 [no data]
* Data aggregated from sources including COMPLETIONmonitor