Norwich and Peterborough Building Society Conveyancing Panel Information

The information on this page is designed to keep solicitors and licensed conveyancers abreast of latest requirements changes by Norwich and Peterborough Building Society and to assist in remaining on the Norwich and Peterborough Building Society Approved Conveyancing Solicitors Panel.

Norwich and Peterborough Building Society Solicitor Panel Assistance:

What are the Norwich and Peterborough Building Society conveyancing panel arrangements?
Unlike the CML the Building Society Mortgage Instructions deal with this. Section A.12 states ‘In order to act on our behalf your firm or company must be a member of our conveyancing panel provided we are a society that operates one – see specific requirements for details of our arrangements. The Special Requirements state:

To be a member of our conveyancing panel you must be CQS accredited, must have submitted an application form, be registered on www.lawsociety.org, produced your current Practising Certificate together with evidence of professional indemnity insurance cover for a minimum of £2m (£3m if the firm is a Limited Liability Partnership or a company). Any panel application is subject to individual assessment and approval.

You must also comply with the terms and conditions of your Norwich and Peterborough Building Society solicitor panel appointment.

Can my firm make a complaint to the BSA about being removed excluded suspended from the Norwich and Peterborough Building Society conveyancing panel?
The BSA is not a regulator and therefore cannot investigate complaints against lenders. You can of course contact us to see if we can help.
Does the fact that my practice receives Alerts via this site assist in my application to join the Norwich and Peterborough Building Society conveyancing panel?
The requirements to join the Norwich and Peterborough Building Society conveyancing panel is likely to be fairly detailed and is unlikely to include signing up to LENDERmonitor alerts.
A recent SRA survey reveals that three quarters of solicitors have been removed or threatened with removal from a lender conveyancing panel. Norwich and Peterborough Building Society and other building societies have restricted their panel over the years. Why?
The feeling from lenders generally (we can not speak for Norwich and Peterborough Building Society specifically), is that for too long solicitors have concentrated on their duty of care to their purchasing client, and have paid scant attention to the duty they owe to the lender, whom they conveniently forget is also their client.

Looking from the lenders’ perspective, it has to be said that there are pressures to encourage smaller panels. The Financial Services Authority regards the open panel system as a major contributor to mortgage fraud and negligence cases, and has been leaning on lenders to move to proactive panel management, which is more expensive the larger the panel. Hence it is becoming more common for lenders to charge fees, and/or require extensive form-filling, from would-be panel members

Norwich and Peterborough Building Society and other BSA lenders are in varying stages of reviewing their approach to vetting firms on their conveyancing panels, to ensure their ongoing exposure to unsuitable firms is reduced.

As the nominated Compliance Officer for Legal Practice are there regulatory implications that I should be considering if my firm is withdrawn off the Norwich and Peterborough Building Society solicitor panel?
What you should do largely depends on the reason that your firm has been removed off the Norwich and Peterborough Building Society conveyancing panel. The top 3 reasons are as follows:
  1. lack of transactions
  2. the lawyer is a sole practitioner
  3. as part of the HSBC panel reduction.
In these three circumstances it is unlikely that you would expected to take any action. Disclosure and other compliance considerations are more likely to be relevant if the reason for removal is due to breaches of lender requirements or allegations of fraud or negligence. Whether the reasoning should trigger a disclosable 'material' breach will depend on the firm and the circumstances around possible failures to comply with the SRA Authorisation Rules, and the SRA will judge each case on its own merits. Factors such as the detriment or risk of detriment to clients, the scale of the issue and overall impact on the firm will need to be considered in deciding whether a failure is 'material'. As the COLP you will need systems to identify patterns of breaches. Even if you don't consider there to be regulatory implications, the firms COFA needs to consider whether he or she needs to take any action as result of being removed from the conveyancing panel of Norwich and Peterborough Building Society.
I have read a number of legal articles recently about firms being sued for non-compliance with BSA Mortgage Instructions. I am on the Norwich and Peterborough Building Society conveyancing panel. Can you tell me how many Specific Requirement changes took place by Norwich and Peterborough Building Society during 2013?
During this period 47 sections of the BSA Mortgage Instructions were changed by Norwich and Peterborough Building Society. Some changes are more important than others but as a firm on the Norwich and Peterborough Building Society conveyancing panel you are of course obliged to comply with individual lender requirements. Locktons have recently pointed out in an article that non-compliance with lender requirements account for a number of high value claims, and it is therefore important to be aware of any particularly onerous terms that an individual lender may impose.

Remember: BSA requirements are not guidelines; they are the lender client’s instructions.

Are figures published disclosing the Norwich and Peterborough Building Society conveyancing panel size and the number of conveyancing firms removed from their panel each quarter?
With lenders and property lawyers working so closely with one another it is surprising that there has not been much call for the introduction of a bit of transparency regarding not just the figures for the Norwich and Peterborough Building Society conveyancing panel but for all bank panel listings
What lender panels do you receive the most questions about?
BSA lenders do not come within the top 20 lenders in terms of frequency of questions. The most popular lender panels in terms of questions are as follows:

Find a Lawyer on the Norwich and Peterborough Building Society Approved Conveyancing Solicitors Panel

powered by LenderPanel

Average number of days to register title including a charge in favour of Norwich and Peterborough Building Society
This information relates to purchase only and not remortgages.
YearDays*
2025 [no data]
2024 [no data]
2023 [no data]
2022 [no data]
2021 [no data]
2020 [no data]
* Data aggregated from sources including COMPLETIONmonitor