Hinckley and Rugby Conveyancing Panel Information

The information on this page is designed to keep solicitors and licensed conveyancers abreast of latest requirements changes by Hinckley and Rugby and to assist in remaining on the Hinckley and Rugby Solicitor Panel.

Hinckley and Rugby Conveyancing Panel: Recently Asked Questions

Read More

Is it the case that the Law Society has recommended that firms check their status on the Hinckley and Rugby conveyancing panel?
The Scottish Law Society has advised that solicitors should check their lender panel status prior to accepting client instructions to act. The advice is lender-agnostic as it does not relate specifically to solicitors on the Hinckley and Rugby conveyancing panel. The suggestion arises from the practice of a number of mortgage lenders who remove solicitors from their panels without prior notice as part of their panel management system, which can lead to some solicitors discovering this only once instructed. This is sensible advice as a client finding out midway through a transaction that their lawyer is not on the approved lender panel is very frustrating and can lead to complaints. Many online consumer forums contain posts where someone is complaining about finding that their lawyer is not on a lender conveyancing panel. Such forums include moneysavingexpert.com
Am I obliged, being on the Hinckley and Rugby conveyancing panel, to carry out a flood search?
Hinckley and Rugby make no specific obligation to carry out any of the searches listed. The UK Finance Lenders’ Handbook simply states that ‘you must ensure that any other searches which may be appropriate to the particular property, taking into account its locality and other features are carried out’.

Please note that most ‘less usual searches’ (as described in the Law Society’s Conveyancing Handbook) are not optional as far as Hinckley and Rugby are concerned if they are ‘appropriate’. Most lenders will not require environmental searches (you should Check Part 2 of UK Finance Lenders’ Handbook to be sure), but you are obliged to explain risks and availability to the client.

Ground stability, Plansearch,flood searches as well as the searches listed in the question are optional – but only to the extent that you have allowed the borrower client to make an informed choice. Regardless of whether there is a mortgage, If you have not advised the client that these (and other) searches are available and what risks they cover, then you will be liable if the client suffers loss through not conducting one. Is this covered within your Terms of Engagement or Report on Title?

A leading search supplier lists over 65 conveyancing searches – do you know what all of them are and when they may be relevant? If you are unsure as to which searches are appropriate based on location call your search provider or call one of the leading search companies such as STL.

I understand that Hinckley and Rugby could request or audit my files as I am on the Hinckley and Rugby conveyancing panel. What do I do if I receive such a request?
We can't comment specifically on Hinckley and Rugby. Many major lenders are now introducing ‘file auditing’ as standard practice in relation to completed matters. This raises questions of confidentiality in relation to the borrower and the purpose to which the results of such audits will be put. The starting point is to remember that the file does not belong to your firm, it belongs to the ‘client’. But, of course, we will normally have two clients – the buyer and the lender - and you will owe a duty of confidentiality to each. So basically, you have to separate the file and just send the lender the parts solely relating to themselves. But, of course, as this will basically be correspondence with the lender, mortgage instructions etc.

Check with your COLP but a firm should not send the complete conveyancing file without the buyer client’s express consent – and if he is in arrears with the lender he is hardly likely to agree. However, if the lender can establish a prima facie case of fraud, then you may be under an obligation to disclose the whole file.

The emerging convention is that lenders are including an authority to disclose in loan application forms to counter this problem. Mortgage Express v Sawali, [2010] EWHC 3054 (Ch) indicates that such provisions are valid. Please click here for more information about that case.

One of our conveyancers is acting for a seller of a property and we have just received an email from the buyers solicitors who are not on the Hinckley and Rugby conveyancing panel requesting that we undertake to send certain post-completion documents to a law firm on the approved solicitor list for Hinckley and Rugby. We have not come accross this before. Do we give the undertaking?
You will be aware of the trend in recent years for lenders such as Hinckley and Rugby to take a much more pro-active approach in relation to the management and make up of their conveyancer panels. The knock on effect of this is that it is more likely that there will be a higher number of cases where a conveyancer is not on the Hinckley and Rugby panel. The situation that you find yourself in is where your client’s purchaser has his/her own lawyer and Hinckley and Rugby have appointed a separate lawyer to act on their behalf where the new CML Part 3 requirements apply. Section 11.1 of the UK Finance Lenders’ Handbook Part 3 requires Hinckley and Rugby’s panel solicitor to ‘ ...transfer the mortgage advance directly to the Seller’s conveyancer. The Seller’s conveyancer must be required to hold the mortgage advance on the terms of the required undertaking. The example borrower’s conveyancer’s undertaking letter includes a specific example of the seller’s undertaking’. You should expect to be advised to received the mortgage advance directly from the conveyancing solicitors for Hinckley and Rugby. You will no doubt be required to undertake directly to Hinckley and Rugby’s solicitors to discharge any charges secured on the property and to send directly to them the executed transfer and any other documents required to enable us to effect registration. Please remember to carefully consider undertakings in accordance with your firm’s protocol and record them in your undertakings logg. Please remember that as well as this breach of this undertaking having regulatory and compliance implications it’s breach could also result in your firm being removed off the Hinckley and Rugby conveyancing panel.
Marsh’s PII renewal form questions if my practice had been excluded from any bank panels in the last 12 months. I recently found out that the practice is no longer on the Hinckley and Rugby solicitor panel? Is this likely to effect my insurance?
Your insurance brokers are your best port of call to address this question. The chances are that on the basis that you have not been removed for fraud or negligence reasons that there will be little or no impact. The main reason why a firm would be removed off of a lender panel is due to low volume of conveyancing cases although there may be a number of criteria for Hinckley and Rugby solicitor panel membership. Please remember that it is always important that you complete your insurance forms accurately.
Our practice is on the Hinckley and Rugby conveyancing panel and all set to complete a purchase within the next few weeks. My papers do not include a Legal Charge for the client to execute. Who do I contact at Hinckley and Rugby to request substitute deeds?
You should get in touch with Hinckley and Rugby to obtain standard documents. The CML Handbook incorporates a specific question for lenders to cite who to contact to obtain standard documents. Hinckley and Rugby in their Part 2’s state:
It is likely that you will need to quote the firm’s Hinckley and Rugby solicitors panel number.

Find a Lawyer on the Hinckley and Rugby Solicitor Panel

powered by LenderPanel

Average number of days to register title including a charge in favour of Hinckley and Rugby
This information relates to purchase only and not remortgages.
YearDays*
2026 [no data]
2025 [no data]
2024 [no data]
2023 [no data]
2022 [no data]
2021 [no data]
* Data aggregated from sources including COMPLETIONmonitor