Skip to content
England & Wales · SRA / CLC firms

Transfer of equity: general practice, and Kensington Mortgages's own position

Kensington Mortgages's requirements on transfer of equity are published rather than private, and they are amended without notice. Here is where they sit and how often they move.

Kensington Mortgages
Topic
Transfer of equity
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Kensington Mortgages Part 2 last changed
2026
Years with a change
10 of the 10 to 2026
Handbook
UK Finance · Part 1 & 2

Part 2 of the UK Finance Mortgage Lenders' Handbook is amended by lenders without notice. Check the current version before relying on any requirement described here.

Transfer of equity, in plain terms

A change in the people named on the title where at least one of the existing owners stays: adding a spouse, removing a former partner, or transferring a share. Where a mortgage is in place the lender must consent, and the lender’s own requirements govern how it is done.

Most of the delay on transfer of equity comes from establishing what the lender wants before anyone starts drafting. Getting that answer early is usually worth more than any amount of chasing later.

Every lender-specific point below is checkable rather than a matter of judgement. Kensington Mortgages publishes its position, the publication is amended without notice, and the only unsafe version is the one somebody remembers.

The work behind transfer of equity

  1. Separate the title from the debt

    Two things move in a transfer of equity and only one of them is conveyancing. The register can be changed by deed; the mortgage covenants change only if the lender agrees. Treating them as one transaction is where most of the trouble starts.

  2. Get the release confirmed, or say plainly that there is none

    A departing owner either leaves the covenants or does not, and the difference is whether they remain personally liable for a debt secured on somebody else's house. Where the lender will not release, the client needs to be told in terms rather than left to infer it.

  3. Work out the tax before anyone signs

    Assumed mortgage debt is chargeable consideration, so a no-money transfer can still be notifiable. Establishing that at the start costs a conversation; establishing it after completion costs a penalty and an explanation.

  4. Identify the adults early

    Occupiers of eighteen or over who are not borrowing will be asked to postpone their interest to the charge. Finding out who they are in week one is administration; finding out in the final week is a delayed completion.

  5. Register the whole picture at once

    The transfer and the variation of the charge are lodged together, so the register never records a period in which the owners changed and the mortgage did not follow.

How often Kensington Mortgages moves the answers above

Some lenders revise their requirements most years and some leave them alone for a decade. These figures place Kensington Mortgages between those.

2026The last year Kensington Mortgages changed its Part 2 requirementsKensington Mortgages has amended Part 2 during the most recent year this record covers.
10 of 10Years since 2017 in which Kensington Mortgages changed Part 2The record for Kensington Mortgages opens in 2009.

Counted from the Lexsure Part 2 change record. Kensington Mortgages has changed its Part 2 in 10 of the 10 years to 2026, most recently in 2026. Counted from the Lexsure Part 2 change record. A lender that revises Part 2 often is not a worse lender than one that leaves it alone: what the figure describes is how far you can rely on what applied last time.

Part 1, Part 2, and Kensington Mortgages's own answers

One document sets out what a conveyancer has to do before Kensington Mortgages releases the money, and it is written in two halves: an industry-wide part and a part the lender writes itself. Almost every surprising request on a mortgage file traces back to one of them.

Part 1

The settled half

  • A single document covering what has to be investigated on any mortgage matter, and what has to be reported back before funds are released.
  • It moves slowly and in public, so a change to it is news rather than a surprise.

Knowing Part 1 tells a conveyancer how the work is done, not what this particular lender wants.

Part 2

The half Kensington Mortgages controls

  • Kensington Mortgages sets its own position here on the points Part 1 hands to it, and can revise that position whenever it decides to.
  • A requirement that applied on the last matter may not apply on this one, and there is no notice period in which to notice.

This is the half worth checking on the day rather than remembering.

A conveyancer who acted on a Kensington Mortgages matter last year may or may not be working from current requirements. The years below are what decides that.

2026The last year Kensington Mortgages changed its Part 2 requirementsKensington Mortgages has amended Part 2 during the most recent year this extract covers.
10 of 10Years since 2017 in which Kensington Mortgages changed Part 2The record for Kensington Mortgages opens in 2009.

Part 2 changes have been recorded for Kensington Mortgages in every year since 2009. A run that reaches the present is the case for reading the current version rather than working from the last matter, and it is the reason this site monitors Part 2 instead of reprinting it.

Counting the amendments rather than the years: Kensington Mortgages has made 1,060 changes to Part 2 sections since 2017, 2 of them in 2026. One amendment can touch several sections, so this counts section changes rather than distinct sections, and revisions that moved nothing but the document’s own date are left out.

Counted from the Lexsure Part 2 change record supplied on 3 August 2026, which holds the years a lender’s Part 2 was amended rather than what any amendment said. 2026 is a part year, because the extract was taken partway through it. A lender that revises Part 2 often is not a worse lender than one that leaves it alone: what these figures describe is how far a conveyancer can rely on what applied last time, which is why the current version is the one to check.

This site says which Part 2 question holds a lender-specific answer rather than reprinting the answer. A stale copy of a requirement, on a page someone acts on, is worse than no copy.

Kensington Mortgages's own position, and where it is published

Before relying on any of these, check the current Part 2. Kensington Mortgages sets its own answer on each of them and there is no notice period before one changes:

  • Whether the charge is varied, or discharged and re-taken on new terms
  • Whether the departing owner is released, and whether any condition attaches to that
  • The occupier consent wording the lender requires, and who may witness it
  • Whether the change triggers an early repayment charge or alters the current product

We do not reproduce Part 2 here. It is lender-specific, it changes without notice, and a stale copy of it on a page a conveyancer relies on is worse than no copy at all. LM04 tracks those changes.

Acting on this lender’s instructions

Panel membership decides whether a firm can act at all. LenderPanel maintains the directory borrowers search when choosing a conveyancer, including for Kensington Mortgages.

Transfer of equity with Kensington Mortgages: common questions

No. Lender Monitor is an independent reference operated by Lexsure Limited and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or appointed by Kensington Mortgages. The name appears to identify which lender the page is about.

Where the property is mortgaged, yes. The charge is affected by the change in ownership, so the lender's consent is part of the transaction rather than a formality afterwards. Whether Kensington Mortgages treats it as a full application is one of the points to confirm.

Possibly, and there is no notice period in which to find out. Part 2 is amended whenever the lender decides, so the version to work from is the current one rather than the one you remember. The figures on this page show how often Kensington Mortgages has moved it.

Not ordinarily. A transfer needs the outgoing owner to execute it, and where they will not, the route is a court order rather than a conveyancing one. A lender releasing someone from the covenant is a separate decision again.

It can be, where consideration is given, and existing mortgage debt taken on by the incoming owner counts as consideration. It is a question for whoever is advising on the tax rather than something to assume either way.
This page is written for conveyancers and is general information rather than advice on any individual matter. Lender Monitor has no affiliation with the lenders it names, holds no endorsement from them, and is not owned by any of them; their names are reproduced only so that readers can tell which lender's requirements are under discussion.