Skip to content
England & Wales · SRA / CLC firms

What Santander requires on buy-to-let conveyancing

On buy-to-let conveyancing a firm is acting for the borrower and for Santander at once, and the two sets of instructions do not always ask for the same things.

Santander
Topic
Buy-to-let conveyancing
Jurisdiction
England & Wales
Santander Part 2 last changed
2026
Years with a change
10 of the 10 to 2026
Handbook
UK Finance · Part 1 & 2

Part 2 of the UK Finance Mortgage Lenders' Handbook is amended by lenders without notice. Check the current version before relying on any requirement described here.

Why Santander takes an interest in buy-to-let conveyancing

Conveyancing on a property bought to be let rather than occupied. Lender requirements differ from residential lending, and Part 2 of the Handbook sets out what each lender expects on tenancies, licensing and permitted occupiers.

This page describes buy-to-let conveyancing as a process. It deliberately stops short of reproducing any lender's own answer, because Part 2 is amended without notice and a stale copy on a page someone acts on is worse than no copy at all.

Most of what goes wrong on buy-to-let conveyancing is not the drafting. It is an assumption about what Santander would accept that turned out to be an assumption about what the last lender accepted, and it surfaces late enough to move a completion date.

What has to be in place

  1. The tenancy that came with the house

    Buying tenanted is a different transaction from buying vacant. The agreement, the protected deposit, any arrears and any notice already served all transfer with the property, and a lender that would fund the same house empty may decline it occupied.

  2. The licence nobody checked

    Where a selective or additional licensing scheme covers the address, letting without the licence is an offence and can cost the landlord a rent repayment order. Lenders increasingly require the licence rather than the intention to apply for one.

  3. The lease that says no

    A leasehold flat may forbid subletting outright, permit it only with the landlord's written consent, or allow it subject to a fee and a notice. That restriction sits in the lease and binds the owner whatever the mortgage says.

  4. The relative moving in

    Letting to family is the most common way a buy-to-let borrower breaches their conditions without realising, because it feels like a private arrangement rather than a tenancy. Some lenders offer a regulated product for exactly this and most simply prohibit it.

How often Santander moves the answers above

Some lenders revise their requirements most years and some leave them alone for a decade. These figures place Santander between those.

2026The last year Santander changed its Part 2 requirementsSantander has amended Part 2 during the most recent year this record covers.
10 of 10Years since 2017 in which Santander changed Part 2The record for Santander opens in 2009.

Counted from the Lexsure Part 2 change record. Santander has changed its Part 2 in 10 of the 10 years to 2026, most recently in 2026. Counted from the Lexsure Part 2 change record. A lender that revises Part 2 often is not a worse lender than one that leaves it alone: what the figure describes is how far you can rely on what applied last time.

How Santander sets its own conveyancing requirements

A conveyancer on a Santander mortgage is acting for two clients at once, and the lender's half of the instructions is a published document: the UK Finance Mortgage Lenders' Handbook. It is the reason your solicitor asks for things that seem to have nothing to do with you.

Part 1

The industry-wide half

  • Written once and applied to every lender in the scheme, which is why a conveyancer can act on a first matter for a lender they have never dealt with.
  • It sets the investigation a firm has to carry out and the terms of the certificate of title it signs at the end of it.
  • Amendments are consulted on and published, so a firm can see one coming.

Part 1 is the reason panel work is comparable between lenders at all.

Part 2

Where Santander answers for itself

  • Every question Part 1 leaves to the lender is answered here, in Santander's own words: indemnity policies, new-build warranties, occupiers, retentions and the rest.
  • It can be amended at any time and without notice, which is the whole reason a firm checks it per matter rather than per year.
  • It is also where two lenders on the same transaction can want different things.

Nothing on this site reproduces a Part 2 answer. Read the current version before acting on any description of one.

Because Part 2 can be amended without notice, the useful question is how often a given lender amends it. Here is the answer for Santander.

2026The last year Santander changed its Part 2 requirementsSantander has amended Part 2 during the most recent year this extract covers.
10 of 10Years since 2017 in which Santander changed Part 2The record for Santander opens in 2009.

Part 2 changes have been recorded for Santander in every year since 2009. A run that reaches the present is the case for reading the current version rather than working from the last matter, and it is the reason this site monitors Part 2 instead of reprinting it.

Counting the amendments rather than the years: Santander has made 730 changes to Part 2 sections since 2017, 41 of them in 2026. One amendment can touch several sections, so this counts section changes rather than distinct sections, and revisions that moved nothing but the document’s own date are left out.

Counted from the Lexsure Part 2 change record supplied on 3 August 2026, which holds the years a lender’s Part 2 was amended rather than what any amendment said. 2026 is a part year, because the extract was taken partway through it. A lender that revises Part 2 often is not a worse lender than one that leaves it alone: what these figures describe is how far a conveyancer can rely on what applied last time, which is why the current version is the one to check.

This site says which Part 2 question holds a lender-specific answer rather than reprinting the answer. A stale copy of a requirement, on a page someone acts on, is worse than no copy.

The points to put to Santander directly

Part 2 of the Handbook carries each lender's own requirements and its overrides of Part 1, and it is amended without notice. These are the points where the answer is Santander's rather than general practice:

  • Whether the property may be let at all under the lease, and on what conditions
  • The tenancy agreement the lender expects, and its minimum and maximum term
  • Whether an inherited tenant is acceptable and what has to be produced
  • Whether a licence must be granted, applied for, or neither, before funds are released

We do not reproduce Part 2 here. It is lender-specific, it changes without notice, and a stale copy of it on a page a conveyancer relies on is worse than no copy at all. LM04 tracks those changes.

Acting on this lender’s instructions

Panel membership decides whether a firm can act at all. LenderPanel maintains the directory borrowers search when choosing a conveyancer, including for Santander.

Buy-to-let conveyancing with Santander: common questions

Most lenders specify an assured shorthold tenancy and set limits on the term, and several exclude particular tenant types or arrangements outright. Santander's own position is in Part 2 and is the sort of requirement that moves, so it is checked per matter rather than remembered.

No. This page is written for England and Wales. The registers, the forms and the practice are different in the other jurisdictions, and none of the procedure here transfers across.

A company borrower usually brings personal guarantees from the directors, a requirement for independent legal advice on those guarantees, and different execution formalities. Not every lender offers it, and whether Santander does is a product question rather than a conveyancing one.

It can. Where the local authority operates a licensing scheme, a lender may require the licence to be in place or may decline the property type entirely. It is worth establishing which scheme applies before exchange rather than after.

Buying with a tenant in place is a different transaction from buying with vacant possession: the tenancy agreement, the deposit protection and any arrears all have to be dealt with, and the lender will have a position on whether it lends at all in that situation.
This page is written for conveyancers and is general information rather than advice on any individual matter. Lender Monitor has no affiliation with the lenders it names, holds no endorsement from them, and is not owned by any of them; their names are reproduced only so that readers can tell which lender's requirements are under discussion.